<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: BMO and Barings</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.moneysmartsblog.com/bmo-and-barings/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.moneysmartsblog.com/bmo-and-barings/</link>
	<description>Investing and Personal Finance</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 14:34:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: FourPillars</title>
		<link>http://www.moneysmartsblog.com/bmo-and-barings/comment-page-1/#comment-139</link>
		<dc:creator>FourPillars</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jun 2007 02:03:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moneysmartsblog.com/bmo-and-barings/#comment-139</guid>
		<description>I just reread the latest edition of Random Walk Down Wall Street which was updated to include the dot com bubble.  Malkiel&#039;s explanation for the market&#039;s inefficiency during that time was that since the market eventually went down, it was eventually efficient.  I like the book but that explanation was a bit lame.

Mike</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just reread the latest edition of Random Walk Down Wall Street which was updated to include the dot com bubble.  Malkiel&#8217;s explanation for the market&#8217;s inefficiency during that time was that since the market eventually went down, it was eventually efficient.  I like the book but that explanation was a bit lame.</p>
<p>Mike</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: moneygardener</title>
		<link>http://www.moneysmartsblog.com/bmo-and-barings/comment-page-1/#comment-138</link>
		<dc:creator>moneygardener</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jun 2007 01:33:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moneysmartsblog.com/bmo-and-barings/#comment-138</guid>
		<description>I guess we all get lucky sometimes.  However the IGM example is my most convincing experience yet, on how the market is not 100% efficient in the short term, or it could have just been a 50/50 bet, I&#039;ll never know.  Good company to take that chance on though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess we all get lucky sometimes.  However the IGM example is my most convincing experience yet, on how the market is not 100% efficient in the short term, or it could have just been a 50/50 bet, I&#8217;ll never know.  Good company to take that chance on though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FourPillars</title>
		<link>http://www.moneysmartsblog.com/bmo-and-barings/comment-page-1/#comment-137</link>
		<dc:creator>FourPillars</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jun 2007 01:22:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moneysmartsblog.com/bmo-and-barings/#comment-137</guid>
		<description>I just looked up the chart for IGM - looks like u got a steal.

You&#039;re right about the dividend propping up the stocks.  I&#039;d be curious to know how the banks did in 2001-2002 compared to the rest of the market.

Mike</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just looked up the chart for IGM &#8211; looks like u got a steal.</p>
<p>You&#8217;re right about the dividend propping up the stocks.  I&#8217;d be curious to know how the banks did in 2001-2002 compared to the rest of the market.</p>
<p>Mike</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: moneygardener</title>
		<link>http://www.moneysmartsblog.com/bmo-and-barings/comment-page-1/#comment-136</link>
		<dc:creator>moneygardener</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jun 2007 00:13:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moneysmartsblog.com/bmo-and-barings/#comment-136</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s just interesting that I commonly hear people talk about this nat. gas trading fiasco, like it was such a big hit to the stock, and such a great time to get in on weakness.  I beg to differ.  The dividend props the stock up to the point that it became a non event.

 Compare it to what happened in January, 2007 to IGM Financial, (my most proud stock entry point) and you can see what I mean.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s just interesting that I commonly hear people talk about this nat. gas trading fiasco, like it was such a big hit to the stock, and such a great time to get in on weakness.  I beg to differ.  The dividend props the stock up to the point that it became a non event.</p>
<p> Compare it to what happened in January, 2007 to IGM Financial, (my most proud stock entry point) and you can see what I mean.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FourPillars</title>
		<link>http://www.moneysmartsblog.com/bmo-and-barings/comment-page-1/#comment-135</link>
		<dc:creator>FourPillars</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jun 2007 00:08:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moneysmartsblog.com/bmo-and-barings/#comment-135</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s true MG.  The price did drop from around $72 before the fiasco but that was a recent high.  

All I know is that those dividends should keep coming and hopefully increasing too!

Mike</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s true MG.  The price did drop from around $72 before the fiasco but that was a recent high.  </p>
<p>All I know is that those dividends should keep coming and hopefully increasing too!</p>
<p>Mike</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: moneygardener</title>
		<link>http://www.moneysmartsblog.com/bmo-and-barings/comment-page-1/#comment-134</link>
		<dc:creator>moneygardener</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jun 2007 00:06:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moneysmartsblog.com/bmo-and-barings/#comment-134</guid>
		<description>As far as share price goes, the whole nat. gas trading fiasco was not really a major event for BMO.  As far as I can see the stock hit ~67.80 after it occured, and is now trading at $68.23 after some good earnings. Technically the chart looks horrible, and I would not be too surprised to see it break below $67.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As far as share price goes, the whole nat. gas trading fiasco was not really a major event for BMO.  As far as I can see the stock hit ~67.80 after it occured, and is now trading at $68.23 after some good earnings. Technically the chart looks horrible, and I would not be too surprised to see it break below $67.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FourPillars</title>
		<link>http://www.moneysmartsblog.com/bmo-and-barings/comment-page-1/#comment-132</link>
		<dc:creator>FourPillars</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jun 2007 21:47:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moneysmartsblog.com/bmo-and-barings/#comment-132</guid>
		<description>Given that Enron was a fraud situation, CIBC can be cut some slack.  BMO - we&#039;ll have to wait to see what happened and how the trading losses occurred.  If it was just lack of supervision then that&#039;s bad news.  On the other hand if it&#039;s fraud then maybe some slack should be cut for them as well.  

Mike</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Given that Enron was a fraud situation, CIBC can be cut some slack.  BMO &#8211; we&#8217;ll have to wait to see what happened and how the trading losses occurred.  If it was just lack of supervision then that&#8217;s bad news.  On the other hand if it&#8217;s fraud then maybe some slack should be cut for them as well.  </p>
<p>Mike</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Canadian Capitalist</title>
		<link>http://www.moneysmartsblog.com/bmo-and-barings/comment-page-1/#comment-131</link>
		<dc:creator>Canadian Capitalist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jun 2007 20:55:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moneysmartsblog.com/bmo-and-barings/#comment-131</guid>
		<description>In my opinion the CIBC Enron write-down is much less worrisome than the BMO trading losses (though I don&#039;t follow either company, it won&#039;t stop me from giving my opinion :) )

Where was the trading oversight? How much of BMO&#039;s capital was at risk? How many more cockroaches are in BMO&#039;s kitchen? If I held BMO, it would surely give me a few sleepless nights.

AJ, what makes you think that CIBC was worse than BMO?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In my opinion the CIBC Enron write-down is much less worrisome than the BMO trading losses (though I don&#8217;t follow either company, it won&#8217;t stop me from giving my opinion <img src='http://www.moneysmartsblog.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  )</p>
<p>Where was the trading oversight? How much of BMO&#8217;s capital was at risk? How many more cockroaches are in BMO&#8217;s kitchen? If I held BMO, it would surely give me a few sleepless nights.</p>
<p>AJ, what makes you think that CIBC was worse than BMO?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mr. Cheap</title>
		<link>http://www.moneysmartsblog.com/bmo-and-barings/comment-page-1/#comment-129</link>
		<dc:creator>Mr. Cheap</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jun 2007 18:00:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moneysmartsblog.com/bmo-and-barings/#comment-129</guid>
		<description>The first dividend check is &quot;oh so sweet&quot; ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The first dividend check is &#8220;oh so sweet&#8221; <img src='http://www.moneysmartsblog.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Average Joe</title>
		<link>http://www.moneysmartsblog.com/bmo-and-barings/comment-page-1/#comment-128</link>
		<dc:creator>Average Joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jun 2007 16:43:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moneysmartsblog.com/bmo-and-barings/#comment-128</guid>
		<description>If CIBC can survive the Enron debacle and still increase their dividend, it almost makes you think that the banks are invulnerable!  Compared to that, the BMO &#039;scandal&#039; doesn&#039;t seem like much.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If CIBC can survive the Enron debacle and still increase their dividend, it almost makes you think that the banks are invulnerable!  Compared to that, the BMO &#8216;scandal&#8217; doesn&#8217;t seem like much.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

