<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: BMO Update and Lots More</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.moneysmartsblog.com/bmo-update-and-lots-more/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.moneysmartsblog.com/bmo-update-and-lots-more/</link>
	<description>Investing and Personal Finance</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 04:38:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: FourPillars</title>
		<link>http://www.moneysmartsblog.com/bmo-update-and-lots-more/comment-page-1/#comment-721</link>
		<dc:creator>FourPillars</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2007 00:31:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moneysmartsblog.com/bmo-update-and-lots-more/#comment-721</guid>
		<description>FB - thanks for the insider trading tip :)

I&#039;ll keep an eye on National Bank as well.

Mike</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>FB &#8211; thanks for the insider trading tip <img src='http://www.moneysmartsblog.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>I&#8217;ll keep an eye on National Bank as well.</p>
<p>Mike</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TheFinancialBlogger</title>
		<link>http://www.moneysmartsblog.com/bmo-update-and-lots-more/comment-page-1/#comment-720</link>
		<dc:creator>TheFinancialBlogger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Aug 2007 21:53:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moneysmartsblog.com/bmo-update-and-lots-more/#comment-720</guid>
		<description>At $65,40, BMO is definitely a good stock to buy. However, they are not the only bank offering over 4% in dividend. National Bank (4,3%) is also a good pick. I don&#039;t know if BMO will be able to keep this rhythm, they are distributing more in dividend than any other banks as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At $65,40, BMO is definitely a good stock to buy. However, they are not the only bank offering over 4% in dividend. National Bank (4,3%) is also a good pick. I don&#8217;t know if BMO will be able to keep this rhythm, they are distributing more in dividend than any other banks as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FourPillars</title>
		<link>http://www.moneysmartsblog.com/bmo-update-and-lots-more/comment-page-1/#comment-716</link>
		<dc:creator>FourPillars</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Aug 2007 18:30:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moneysmartsblog.com/bmo-update-and-lots-more/#comment-716</guid>
		<description>Lol - I&#039;m not sure I want to see that Mr. Cheap.

Mike</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lol &#8211; I&#8217;m not sure I want to see that Mr. Cheap.</p>
<p>Mike</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: moneygardener</title>
		<link>http://www.moneysmartsblog.com/bmo-update-and-lots-more/comment-page-1/#comment-715</link>
		<dc:creator>moneygardener</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Aug 2007 18:11:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moneysmartsblog.com/bmo-update-and-lots-more/#comment-715</guid>
		<description>good idea Balki</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>good idea Balki</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FourPillars</title>
		<link>http://www.moneysmartsblog.com/bmo-update-and-lots-more/comment-page-1/#comment-713</link>
		<dc:creator>FourPillars</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Aug 2007 13:36:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moneysmartsblog.com/bmo-update-and-lots-more/#comment-713</guid>
		<description>MG - I did think it was a bit odd to raise the dividend by 2 cents considering they already raised it this year and they had some big losses from the trading.  21% increase is pretty huge.

Mike</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>MG &#8211; I did think it was a bit odd to raise the dividend by 2 cents considering they already raised it this year and they had some big losses from the trading.  21% increase is pretty huge.</p>
<p>Mike</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: moneygardener</title>
		<link>http://www.moneysmartsblog.com/bmo-update-and-lots-more/comment-page-1/#comment-711</link>
		<dc:creator>moneygardener</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Aug 2007 13:05:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moneysmartsblog.com/bmo-update-and-lots-more/#comment-711</guid>
		<description>An interesting thing that I&#039;ve notice with BMO compared with Canada&#039;s other big banks with repsect to dividends is that BMO seems to raise it&#039;s dividend in no apparent pattern.  They don&#039;t raise once a year (every 4 payments), and they dont&#039; raise twice a year (every 2 payments).  This has allowed them to recently be quite the aggressive dividend grower.

For example in 2006 they paid $2.26

So far in 2007 they&#039;ve paid $0.65 + $0.68 + $0.70 + $0.70 (expected assuming no raise) = $2.73

This represents a year over year raise of at least 21% assuming they do not raise their last payment of 2007.  It&#039;s an interesting way to go about it.  Holding BMO, it must be interesting to not know what will happen and be surprised with several small increases that add up to a large annual raise.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An interesting thing that I&#8217;ve notice with BMO compared with Canada&#8217;s other big banks with repsect to dividends is that BMO seems to raise it&#8217;s dividend in no apparent pattern.  They don&#8217;t raise once a year (every 4 payments), and they dont&#8217; raise twice a year (every 2 payments).  This has allowed them to recently be quite the aggressive dividend grower.</p>
<p>For example in 2006 they paid $2.26</p>
<p>So far in 2007 they&#8217;ve paid $0.65 + $0.68 + $0.70 + $0.70 (expected assuming no raise) = $2.73</p>
<p>This represents a year over year raise of at least 21% assuming they do not raise their last payment of 2007.  It&#8217;s an interesting way to go about it.  Holding BMO, it must be interesting to not know what will happen and be surprised with several small increases that add up to a large annual raise.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

