<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Canon PowerShot 200SX &#8211; New Point And Shoot Camera</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.moneysmartsblog.com/canon-powershot-200sx-new-point-and-shoot-camera/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.moneysmartsblog.com/canon-powershot-200sx-new-point-and-shoot-camera/</link>
	<description>Investing and Personal Finance</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 17:11:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Different Types Of Search Engine Visitors : Blogthority</title>
		<link>http://www.moneysmartsblog.com/canon-powershot-200sx-new-point-and-shoot-camera/comment-page-1/#comment-68732</link>
		<dc:creator>Different Types Of Search Engine Visitors : Blogthority</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Apr 2010 22:52:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moneysmartsblog.com/?p=4348#comment-68732</guid>
		<description></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] relates to the product they want to buy.  For example if you write a review of the wonderful Canon 200sx point and shoot camera and Dude types in &#8220;Canon 200sx&#8221; into a search engine &#8211; then he might end up on [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Four Pillars</title>
		<link>http://www.moneysmartsblog.com/canon-powershot-200sx-new-point-and-shoot-camera/comment-page-1/#comment-27434</link>
		<dc:creator>Four Pillars</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2009 16:38:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moneysmartsblog.com/?p=4348#comment-27434</guid>
		<description>Yah, having more batteries would be the logical answer.  

I was thinking the dual recharging scenario might work if the auto-recharge feature was really slow (ie 3 days to recharge).  At least you could manually recharge the batteries once in a while (ie at night in the hotel room).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yah, having more batteries would be the logical answer.  </p>
<p>I was thinking the dual recharging scenario might work if the auto-recharge feature was really slow (ie 3 days to recharge).  At least you could manually recharge the batteries once in a while (ie at night in the hotel room).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Traciatim</title>
		<link>http://www.moneysmartsblog.com/canon-powershot-200sx-new-point-and-shoot-camera/comment-page-1/#comment-27432</link>
		<dc:creator>Traciatim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2009 16:22:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moneysmartsblog.com/?p=4348#comment-27432</guid>
		<description>Well, there&#039;s the trouble. In most cases where you are taking lots of pictures (at least in my case) there is no option to manually charge. It&#039;s not like you&#039;re walking through the zoo/themepark/playground/flower garden . . .  with a huge extension cord and your charger plugged in the wall.

If I was that concerned about high capacity batteries (IE, more than just taking 2 full capacity battery sets with me, either 2 Li-Ion packs for your camera or 2 sets of AA&#039;s if your camera takes those) then I would probably just use a product like this (or build your own in a fanny-pack):
http://www.samys.com/product_detail.php?item=10679</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, there&#8217;s the trouble. In most cases where you are taking lots of pictures (at least in my case) there is no option to manually charge. It&#8217;s not like you&#8217;re walking through the zoo/themepark/playground/flower garden . . .  with a huge extension cord and your charger plugged in the wall.</p>
<p>If I was that concerned about high capacity batteries (IE, more than just taking 2 full capacity battery sets with me, either 2 Li-Ion packs for your camera or 2 sets of AA&#8217;s if your camera takes those) then I would probably just use a product like this (or build your own in a fanny-pack):<br />
<a href="http://www.samys.com/product_detail.php?item=10679" rel="nofollow">http://www.samys.com/product_detail.php?item=10679</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Four Pillars</title>
		<link>http://www.moneysmartsblog.com/canon-powershot-200sx-new-point-and-shoot-camera/comment-page-1/#comment-27327</link>
		<dc:creator>Four Pillars</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2009 17:03:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moneysmartsblog.com/?p=4348#comment-27327</guid>
		<description>Traciatim - I was going to mention that the self-charging feature would be less useful if you are click-happy.  

What about a battery that self-charges AND can be manually recharged?
The self-charge feature would probably meet most of your charging needs and the manual charger would take care of the times you take a ton of pics.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Traciatim &#8211; I was going to mention that the self-charging feature would be less useful if you are click-happy.  </p>
<p>What about a battery that self-charges AND can be manually recharged?<br />
The self-charge feature would probably meet most of your charging needs and the manual charger would take care of the times you take a ton of pics.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Traciatim</title>
		<link>http://www.moneysmartsblog.com/canon-powershot-200sx-new-point-and-shoot-camera/comment-page-1/#comment-27312</link>
		<dc:creator>Traciatim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2009 15:30:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moneysmartsblog.com/?p=4348#comment-27312</guid>
		<description>The trouble I find with self charging is that there will be a space premium. Which would you rather have, a larger higher capacity battery, or a self charging battery?

Lets say the difference is a 2000mah battery that takes 200 pictures and self charges, or a 3000mah battery that takes 300 pictures and doesn&#039;t . . . I suppose it depends on how quickly you take the pictures. Plus, will the lower capacity be more expensive to have the charging circuitry built in?

I&#039;ve read a bunch on different wireless power solutions. It seems, like camera lenses, there is always a trade off and no one is perfect in all scenarios.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The trouble I find with self charging is that there will be a space premium. Which would you rather have, a larger higher capacity battery, or a self charging battery?</p>
<p>Lets say the difference is a 2000mah battery that takes 200 pictures and self charges, or a 3000mah battery that takes 300 pictures and doesn&#8217;t . . . I suppose it depends on how quickly you take the pictures. Plus, will the lower capacity be more expensive to have the charging circuitry built in?</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve read a bunch on different wireless power solutions. It seems, like camera lenses, there is always a trade off and no one is perfect in all scenarios.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BigAssSuperstar</title>
		<link>http://www.moneysmartsblog.com/canon-powershot-200sx-new-point-and-shoot-camera/comment-page-1/#comment-27286</link>
		<dc:creator>BigAssSuperstar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2009 03:10:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moneysmartsblog.com/?p=4348#comment-27286</guid>
		<description>So did Tesla! I read on Yahoo that one of the cell phone companies -- Nokia, maybe? -- is 3-5 years away from commercial availability of such a technology. Harnessing electromagnetic energy that&#039;s just flying around all the time, and using it to charge the cell phone batteries. Not enough energy to run a light bulb, but if it means never having to change the batteries on my camera or phone, it&#039;s good enough for me!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So did Tesla! I read on Yahoo that one of the cell phone companies &#8212; Nokia, maybe? &#8212; is 3-5 years away from commercial availability of such a technology. Harnessing electromagnetic energy that&#8217;s just flying around all the time, and using it to charge the cell phone batteries. Not enough energy to run a light bulb, but if it means never having to change the batteries on my camera or phone, it&#8217;s good enough for me!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Four Pillars</title>
		<link>http://www.moneysmartsblog.com/canon-powershot-200sx-new-point-and-shoot-camera/comment-page-1/#comment-27284</link>
		<dc:creator>Four Pillars</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2009 02:59:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moneysmartsblog.com/?p=4348#comment-27284</guid>
		<description>BAS - I like the idea of an auto-recharge feature!  :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BAS &#8211; I like the idea of an auto-recharge feature!  <img src='http://www.moneysmartsblog.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BigAssSuperstar</title>
		<link>http://www.moneysmartsblog.com/canon-powershot-200sx-new-point-and-shoot-camera/comment-page-1/#comment-27268</link>
		<dc:creator>BigAssSuperstar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2009 01:18:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moneysmartsblog.com/?p=4348#comment-27268</guid>
		<description>I find it useful to apply the same logic to digital cameras as I do to PCs...
- if you can afford it, it&#039;s probably almost obsolete.. or at least there&#039;s something better out there, so don&#039;t fret about getting the best of the best, and
- count on spending about the same time every time you upgrade. you&#039;ll just get a ton more each time.

My first digital camera was about $500 ... 1.3 megapixels, I think, pre-USB, and it took a ton of batteries. Five years later I spent about the same and got one with a bigger screen, video, better battery life, etc. etc. Now that camera can be had for about $150. When I get around to upgrading again, I&#039;m sure I&#039;ll get HD video, autowhatsits up the yinyang, and it&#039;ll recharge itself by absorbing stray radio waves.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I find it useful to apply the same logic to digital cameras as I do to PCs&#8230;<br />
- if you can afford it, it&#8217;s probably almost obsolete.. or at least there&#8217;s something better out there, so don&#8217;t fret about getting the best of the best, and<br />
- count on spending about the same time every time you upgrade. you&#8217;ll just get a ton more each time.</p>
<p>My first digital camera was about $500 &#8230; 1.3 megapixels, I think, pre-USB, and it took a ton of batteries. Five years later I spent about the same and got one with a bigger screen, video, better battery life, etc. etc. Now that camera can be had for about $150. When I get around to upgrading again, I&#8217;m sure I&#8217;ll get HD video, autowhatsits up the yinyang, and it&#8217;ll recharge itself by absorbing stray radio waves.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Financial Blogger &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Financial Ramblings</title>
		<link>http://www.moneysmartsblog.com/canon-powershot-200sx-new-point-and-shoot-camera/comment-page-1/#comment-26306</link>
		<dc:creator>The Financial Blogger &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Financial Ramblings</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2009 12:22:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moneysmartsblog.com/?p=4348#comment-26306</guid>
		<description>[...] Pillars just bought a brand new camera. Looks like he made a lot of research before making his [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Pillars just bought a brand new camera. Looks like he made a lot of research before making his [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sean</title>
		<link>http://www.moneysmartsblog.com/canon-powershot-200sx-new-point-and-shoot-camera/comment-page-1/#comment-26192</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2009 14:22:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moneysmartsblog.com/?p=4348#comment-26192</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve found this website userful when looking at cameras: http://www.dpreview.com/

They do very thorough reviews, rank many cameras in the same class on varying factors to help you choose the right one for you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve found this website userful when looking at cameras: <a href="http://www.dpreview.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.dpreview.com/</a></p>
<p>They do very thorough reviews, rank many cameras in the same class on varying factors to help you choose the right one for you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

