<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How to Predict the Future Part 2</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.moneysmartsblog.com/how-to-predict-the-future-part-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.moneysmartsblog.com/how-to-predict-the-future-part-2/</link>
	<description>Investing and Personal Finance</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 31 Jul 2010 15:45:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Four Pillars &#8250; How to Predict the Future Part 1</title>
		<link>http://www.moneysmartsblog.com/how-to-predict-the-future-part-2/comment-page-1/#comment-773</link>
		<dc:creator>Four Pillars &#8250; How to Predict the Future Part 1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Sep 2007 03:00:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moneysmartsblog.com/how-to-predict-the-future-part-2/#comment-773</guid>
		<description>[...] How to Predict the Future Part II [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] How to Predict the Future Part II [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FourPillars</title>
		<link>http://www.moneysmartsblog.com/how-to-predict-the-future-part-2/comment-page-1/#comment-336</link>
		<dc:creator>FourPillars</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Jul 2007 00:40:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moneysmartsblog.com/how-to-predict-the-future-part-2/#comment-336</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;WB - you&#039;ll notice that I didn&#039;t even mention Bob&#039;s income.  I&#039;ll agree that most people need less than 60-80% but it&#039;s really up to the individual.  I&#039;m more a fan of a cost-based analysis to determine how much you should save rather than a simple percentage of pre-retirement income.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I&#039;ll be posting more detailed analysis on the this topic - one of the things I&#039;ve been thinking about is that the 4% rule may not be that relevant to most Canadians who retire early since we will have government income kicking in at age 60-65.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Mike&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WB &#8211; you&#8217;ll notice that I didn&#8217;t even mention Bob&#8217;s income.  I&#8217;ll agree that most people need less than 60-80% but it&#8217;s really up to the individual.  I&#8217;m more a fan of a cost-based analysis to determine how much you should save rather than a simple percentage of pre-retirement income.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll be posting more detailed analysis on the this topic &#8211; one of the things I&#8217;ve been thinking about is that the 4% rule may not be that relevant to most Canadians who retire early since we will have government income kicking in at age 60-65.</p>
<p>Mike</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WB</title>
		<link>http://www.moneysmartsblog.com/how-to-predict-the-future-part-2/comment-page-1/#comment-331</link>
		<dc:creator>WB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jul 2007 07:39:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moneysmartsblog.com/how-to-predict-the-future-part-2/#comment-331</guid>
		<description>A recent actuarial study concluded that the 60 to 80% of pre-retirement income often recommended by financial advisers in order to maintain a similar standard of living, is in error, and that 50% is more like it. Bob may well find that only $40,000 is required, and that the amount of capital required to achieve it is less.

For what it  is worth, I tend to use 5% payout, as opposed to 4%</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A recent actuarial study concluded that the 60 to 80% of pre-retirement income often recommended by financial advisers in order to maintain a similar standard of living, is in error, and that 50% is more like it. Bob may well find that only $40,000 is required, and that the amount of capital required to achieve it is less.</p>
<p>For what it  is worth, I tend to use 5% payout, as opposed to 4%</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- WP Super Cache is installed but broken. The path to wp-cache-phase1.php in wp-content/advanced-cache.php must be fixed! -->