<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Investment Performance for 2007</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.moneysmartsblog.com/investment-performance-for-2007/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.moneysmartsblog.com/investment-performance-for-2007/</link>
	<description>Investing and Personal Finance</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 04:38:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sat Weigh-In and LinkStuff &#124; Quest For Four Pillars</title>
		<link>http://www.moneysmartsblog.com/investment-performance-for-2007/comment-page-1/#comment-3073</link>
		<dc:creator>Sat Weigh-In and LinkStuff &#124; Quest For Four Pillars</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jan 2008 14:03:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moneysmartsblog.com/investment-performance-for-2007/#comment-3073</guid>
		<description>[...] hosted the Carnival of Money Stories and included my post called 2007 Investment Returns (hey you gotta enter [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] hosted the Carnival of Money Stories and included my post called 2007 Investment Returns (hey you gotta enter [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Four Pillars</title>
		<link>http://www.moneysmartsblog.com/investment-performance-for-2007/comment-page-1/#comment-2734</link>
		<dc:creator>Four Pillars</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2008 23:14:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moneysmartsblog.com/investment-performance-for-2007/#comment-2734</guid>
		<description>Mr. C - I&#039;ll check out my 4P book and see what it says. 

Mike</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mr. C &#8211; I&#8217;ll check out my 4P book and see what it says. </p>
<p>Mike</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mr. Cheap</title>
		<link>http://www.moneysmartsblog.com/investment-performance-for-2007/comment-page-1/#comment-2732</link>
		<dc:creator>Mr. Cheap</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2008 20:07:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moneysmartsblog.com/investment-performance-for-2007/#comment-2732</guid>
		<description>I may be wrong, but long term I think a 7% REAL return is reasonable (is that what Bernstein suggests?).  A 7% nominal return should be quite conservative (you should definitely be able to see that and meet any objectives you make using that number).

Good idea to be conservative so you aren&#039;t eating Alpo in your golden years though...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I may be wrong, but long term I think a 7% REAL return is reasonable (is that what Bernstein suggests?).  A 7% nominal return should be quite conservative (you should definitely be able to see that and meet any objectives you make using that number).</p>
<p>Good idea to be conservative so you aren&#8217;t eating Alpo in your golden years though&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Four Pillars</title>
		<link>http://www.moneysmartsblog.com/investment-performance-for-2007/comment-page-1/#comment-2717</link>
		<dc:creator>Four Pillars</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2008 03:40:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moneysmartsblog.com/investment-performance-for-2007/#comment-2717</guid>
		<description>MG - I should use something like that.  I know the irr function works pretty well for that sort of calculation.

Sure, send it on.

Mike</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>MG &#8211; I should use something like that.  I know the irr function works pretty well for that sort of calculation.</p>
<p>Sure, send it on.</p>
<p>Mike</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: moneygardener</title>
		<link>http://www.moneysmartsblog.com/investment-performance-for-2007/comment-page-1/#comment-2716</link>
		<dc:creator>moneygardener</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2008 03:37:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moneysmartsblog.com/investment-performance-for-2007/#comment-2716</guid>
		<description>If you need a good time / new money weighted return calculator let me know....I have one in Excel.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you need a good time / new money weighted return calculator let me know&#8230;.I have one in Excel.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FourPillars</title>
		<link>http://www.moneysmartsblog.com/investment-performance-for-2007/comment-page-1/#comment-2714</link>
		<dc:creator>FourPillars</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2008 00:01:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moneysmartsblog.com/investment-performance-for-2007/#comment-2714</guid>
		<description>GIV - well I guess it would depend on what you bought??

Actually October probably was a good time to buy.

Mike</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>GIV &#8211; well I guess it would depend on what you bought??</p>
<p>Actually October probably was a good time to buy.</p>
<p>Mike</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: growthinvalue</title>
		<link>http://www.moneysmartsblog.com/investment-performance-for-2007/comment-page-1/#comment-2713</link>
		<dc:creator>growthinvalue</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2008 23:30:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moneysmartsblog.com/investment-performance-for-2007/#comment-2713</guid>
		<description></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>if you couldn’t have money invested at the beginning you would have been better not investing at all (20/20 hindsight!)</i></p>
<p>Fantastic news, considering I made four buy orders in total during 2007, all of which were between April and October&#8230;.</p>
<p>Just like that old chestnut says: &#8220;Buy in May and watch the returns roll in!&#8221; </p>
<p>Isn&#8217;t that it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FourPillars</title>
		<link>http://www.moneysmartsblog.com/investment-performance-for-2007/comment-page-1/#comment-2710</link>
		<dc:creator>FourPillars</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2008 19:30:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moneysmartsblog.com/investment-performance-for-2007/#comment-2710</guid>
		<description>Mr. C - nominal return.

For retirement planning I use 7% nominal return minus 3% inflation = 4% real return.

Considering I&#039;m 75% equity I&#039;m not sure if that is too high but it&#039;s good enough for long range estimates which are complete guesses anyways.

Mike</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mr. C &#8211; nominal return.</p>
<p>For retirement planning I use 7% nominal return minus 3% inflation = 4% real return.</p>
<p>Considering I&#8217;m 75% equity I&#8217;m not sure if that is too high but it&#8217;s good enough for long range estimates which are complete guesses anyways.</p>
<p>Mike</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mr. Cheap</title>
		<link>http://www.moneysmartsblog.com/investment-performance-for-2007/comment-page-1/#comment-2709</link>
		<dc:creator>Mr. Cheap</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2008 18:24:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moneysmartsblog.com/investment-performance-for-2007/#comment-2709</guid>
		<description>Is your 7% target real return or nominal return?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is your 7% target real return or nominal return?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Canadian Capitalist</title>
		<link>http://www.moneysmartsblog.com/investment-performance-for-2007/comment-page-1/#comment-2705</link>
		<dc:creator>Canadian Capitalist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2008 13:02:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moneysmartsblog.com/investment-performance-for-2007/#comment-2705</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the link again. I should clarify that the asset class returns in my post (cited here as well) are total returns including dividends.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the link again. I should clarify that the asset class returns in my post (cited here as well) are total returns including dividends.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

