<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: My Portfolio – Detailed Asset Allocation for Equities</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.moneysmartsblog.com/my-portfolio-%e2%80%93-detailed-asset-allocation-for-equities/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.moneysmartsblog.com/my-portfolio-%e2%80%93-detailed-asset-allocation-for-equities/</link>
	<description>Investing and Personal Finance</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Sep 2010 00:43:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: ThickenMyWallet</title>
		<link>http://www.moneysmartsblog.com/my-portfolio-%e2%80%93-detailed-asset-allocation-for-equities/comment-page-1/#comment-67</link>
		<dc:creator>ThickenMyWallet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jun 2007 18:05:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moneysmartsblog.com/my-portfolio-%e2%80%93-detailed-asset-allocation-for-equities/#comment-67</guid>
		<description>Yes, you have to be careful with the  international/emerging markets distinction. Most of the products I see tend to put Japan in international and China in emerging markets.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, you have to be careful with the  international/emerging markets distinction. Most of the products I see tend to put Japan in international and China in emerging markets.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FourPillars</title>
		<link>http://www.moneysmartsblog.com/my-portfolio-%e2%80%93-detailed-asset-allocation-for-equities/comment-page-1/#comment-65</link>
		<dc:creator>FourPillars</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Jun 2007 00:33:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moneysmartsblog.com/my-portfolio-%e2%80%93-detailed-asset-allocation-for-equities/#comment-65</guid>
		<description>Hi Thicken, by international I&#039;m referring to EAFE - Europe, Asia &amp; Far East as in the MSCI index.  I consider China to be part of the emerging market class.

I&#039;ll have to take a closer look at what is in EAFE - obviously there are some asian countries that are fairly well developed and some that aren&#039;t.

Is this what you are thinking as well?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Thicken, by international I&#8217;m referring to EAFE &#8211; Europe, Asia &#038; Far East as in the MSCI index.  I consider China to be part of the emerging market class.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll have to take a closer look at what is in EAFE &#8211; obviously there are some asian countries that are fairly well developed and some that aren&#8217;t.</p>
<p>Is this what you are thinking as well?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ThickenMyWallet</title>
		<link>http://www.moneysmartsblog.com/my-portfolio-%e2%80%93-detailed-asset-allocation-for-equities/comment-page-1/#comment-64</link>
		<dc:creator>ThickenMyWallet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jun 2007 22:54:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moneysmartsblog.com/my-portfolio-%e2%80%93-detailed-asset-allocation-for-equities/#comment-64</guid>
		<description>Can you clarify what you consider international and emerging markets? You comments seem to imply you lump China into both.  Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can you clarify what you consider international and emerging markets? You comments seem to imply you lump China into both.  Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FourPillars</title>
		<link>http://www.moneysmartsblog.com/my-portfolio-%e2%80%93-detailed-asset-allocation-for-equities/comment-page-1/#comment-63</link>
		<dc:creator>FourPillars</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jun 2007 18:59:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moneysmartsblog.com/my-portfolio-%e2%80%93-detailed-asset-allocation-for-equities/#comment-63</guid>
		<description>CC - I tend to lump REITs in with equities because in my mind they are closer to equities than fixed income.  From a volatility point of view, I consider the fixed income portion to be the stable portion of the portfolio whereas equities &amp; REITs are more volatile even though hopefully REITs will not correlate with equities all that well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>CC &#8211; I tend to lump REITs in with equities because in my mind they are closer to equities than fixed income.  From a volatility point of view, I consider the fixed income portion to be the stable portion of the portfolio whereas equities &amp; REITs are more volatile even though hopefully REITs will not correlate with equities all that well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Canadian Capitalist</title>
		<link>http://www.moneysmartsblog.com/my-portfolio-%e2%80%93-detailed-asset-allocation-for-equities/comment-page-1/#comment-62</link>
		<dc:creator>Canadian Capitalist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jun 2007 17:50:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moneysmartsblog.com/my-portfolio-%e2%80%93-detailed-asset-allocation-for-equities/#comment-62</guid>
		<description>Your equity allocation is a bit confusing (for me) because normally REITs are considered a separate asset class and not as part of equities.

33% sounds about right for US equities because you have overweighted Canada at 20%. 45% of 80% is roughly 36%, so you are a bit less under weighted, but I don&#039;t see that as a big deal.

REIT allocation recommendations are all over the map. Apparently, real estate risk-reward profile is between that of bonds and stocks, so 5%-10% sounds about right to me. I don&#039;t think there is a right or wrong answer here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your equity allocation is a bit confusing (for me) because normally REITs are considered a separate asset class and not as part of equities.</p>
<p>33% sounds about right for US equities because you have overweighted Canada at 20%. 45% of 80% is roughly 36%, so you are a bit less under weighted, but I don&#8217;t see that as a big deal.</p>
<p>REIT allocation recommendations are all over the map. Apparently, real estate risk-reward profile is between that of bonds and stocks, so 5%-10% sounds about right to me. I don&#8217;t think there is a right or wrong answer here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FourPillars</title>
		<link>http://www.moneysmartsblog.com/my-portfolio-%e2%80%93-detailed-asset-allocation-for-equities/comment-page-1/#comment-56</link>
		<dc:creator>FourPillars</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jun 2007 02:13:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moneysmartsblog.com/my-portfolio-%e2%80%93-detailed-asset-allocation-for-equities/#comment-56</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks CM - I can&#039;t criticize other investors for having mostly Canadian equity since I was in that group as well until last year.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I think a lot of it is a holdover from the foreign content limit days when you had to have 80% and then 70% Canadian.  Most investors got used to that and have a hard time lowering their Canadian exposure.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It wouldn&#039;t be so bad investing in a small economy if it were more diversified but unfortunately our economy has lots of financials, energy, materials and that&#039;s it.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;By the way - I added you to my blogroll.&lt;br /&gt;

Mike&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks CM &#8211; I can&#8217;t criticize other investors for having mostly Canadian equity since I was in that group as well until last year.</p>
<p>I think a lot of it is a holdover from the foreign content limit days when you had to have 80% and then 70% Canadian.  Most investors got used to that and have a hard time lowering their Canadian exposure.</p>
<p>It wouldn&#8217;t be so bad investing in a small economy if it were more diversified but unfortunately our economy has lots of financials, energy, materials and that&#8217;s it.</p>
<p>By the way &#8211; I added you to my blogroll.</p>
<p>Mike</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CrunchMoney</title>
		<link>http://www.moneysmartsblog.com/my-portfolio-%e2%80%93-detailed-asset-allocation-for-equities/comment-page-1/#comment-54</link>
		<dc:creator>CrunchMoney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jun 2007 01:52:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moneysmartsblog.com/my-portfolio-%e2%80%93-detailed-asset-allocation-for-equities/#comment-54</guid>
		<description>nice allocation!  I agree with your geographic allocations.....I still can&#039;t understand why so many people keep most of their money invested only in Canada!  I think having some international exposure is extremely important especially since the run we&#039;ve been enjoying in Canada.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>nice allocation!  I agree with your geographic allocations&#8230;..I still can&#8217;t understand why so many people keep most of their money invested only in Canada!  I think having some international exposure is extremely important especially since the run we&#8217;ve been enjoying in Canada.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- WP Super Cache is installed but broken. The path to wp-cache-phase1.php in wp-content/advanced-cache.php must be fixed! -->