<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: RESP &#8211; A Comparison to Non-Registered Accounts</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.moneysmartsblog.com/resp-a-comparison-to-non-registered-accounts/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.moneysmartsblog.com/resp-a-comparison-to-non-registered-accounts/</link>
	<description>Investing and Personal Finance</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 17:11:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://www.moneysmartsblog.com/resp-a-comparison-to-non-registered-accounts/comment-page-1/#comment-37222</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 02:56:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moneysmartsblog.com/resp-a-comparison-to-non-registered-accounts/#comment-37222</guid>
		<description>Hi John - thanks for the comment.

I did not make that assumption - I assumed the non-registered account would be in the  parent&#039;s name.  The idea is to compare with the resp where the money is always owned by the parent until it is given to the student.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi John &#8211; thanks for the comment.</p>
<p>I did not make that assumption &#8211; I assumed the non-registered account would be in the  parent&#8217;s name.  The idea is to compare with the resp where the money is always owned by the parent until it is given to the student.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John D</title>
		<link>http://www.moneysmartsblog.com/resp-a-comparison-to-non-registered-accounts/comment-page-1/#comment-37220</link>
		<dc:creator>John D</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 02:31:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moneysmartsblog.com/resp-a-comparison-to-non-registered-accounts/#comment-37220</guid>
		<description>Under scenario #4, have you assumed that the non-registered account would be in the child&#039;s name?  If so, the taxable portion capital gains would not be attributable to the parent during the child&#039;s younger years (i.e. 0 to 18 years).  Dividends would be taxed in the parent&#039;s hands as they are attributable.  Since the capital gains would be taxed in the child&#039;s hands and they get the personal tax amount free each year, it would be safe to say that a strategy could easily be built to get tax-free capital gains.  Would this not save an additional $7,470 on the non-RESP acct?

John</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Under scenario #4, have you assumed that the non-registered account would be in the child&#8217;s name?  If so, the taxable portion capital gains would not be attributable to the parent during the child&#8217;s younger years (i.e. 0 to 18 years).  Dividends would be taxed in the parent&#8217;s hands as they are attributable.  Since the capital gains would be taxed in the child&#8217;s hands and they get the personal tax amount free each year, it would be safe to say that a strategy could easily be built to get tax-free capital gains.  Would this not save an additional $7,470 on the non-RESP acct?</p>
<p>John</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Four Pillars</title>
		<link>http://www.moneysmartsblog.com/resp-a-comparison-to-non-registered-accounts/comment-page-1/#comment-10836</link>
		<dc:creator>Four Pillars</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 16:15:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moneysmartsblog.com/resp-a-comparison-to-non-registered-accounts/#comment-10836</guid>
		<description>Ahhh - that makes sense now.

From what I understand about informal trusts - any capital gains taxes have to be paid by the owner of the trust ie a parent who has an &#039;in trust for&#039; account for their child.

I&#039;m not sure about a formal trust - maybe the trust itself pays the tax?  You should really talk to a professional about this one - or the administrators of the trust.

One thing I know for sure is that the fact the money is going to an RESP has nothing to do with the trust tax issues.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ahhh &#8211; that makes sense now.</p>
<p>From what I understand about informal trusts &#8211; any capital gains taxes have to be paid by the owner of the trust ie a parent who has an &#8216;in trust for&#8217; account for their child.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not sure about a formal trust &#8211; maybe the trust itself pays the tax?  You should really talk to a professional about this one &#8211; or the administrators of the trust.</p>
<p>One thing I know for sure is that the fact the money is going to an RESP has nothing to do with the trust tax issues.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PTR</title>
		<link>http://www.moneysmartsblog.com/resp-a-comparison-to-non-registered-accounts/comment-page-1/#comment-10833</link>
		<dc:creator>PTR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 15:43:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moneysmartsblog.com/resp-a-comparison-to-non-registered-accounts/#comment-10833</guid>
		<description>Yes, the tax on withdrawal from the trust.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, the tax on withdrawal from the trust.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Four Pillars</title>
		<link>http://www.moneysmartsblog.com/resp-a-comparison-to-non-registered-accounts/comment-page-1/#comment-10829</link>
		<dc:creator>Four Pillars</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 15:14:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moneysmartsblog.com/resp-a-comparison-to-non-registered-accounts/#comment-10829</guid>
		<description>PTR - there are no tax implications to a contribution to an RESP.

Are you referring to the withdrawal from the trust?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>PTR &#8211; there are no tax implications to a contribution to an RESP.</p>
<p>Are you referring to the withdrawal from the trust?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PTR</title>
		<link>http://www.moneysmartsblog.com/resp-a-comparison-to-non-registered-accounts/comment-page-1/#comment-10824</link>
		<dc:creator>PTR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 14:40:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moneysmartsblog.com/resp-a-comparison-to-non-registered-accounts/#comment-10824</guid>
		<description>OK, I&#039;ll try to clarify. Have a situation where a family trust is contributing to an RESP for a minor (likely to a trust). Is the contribution taxable? If so, who is taxable - the contributing trust, or the minor?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK, I&#8217;ll try to clarify. Have a situation where a family trust is contributing to an RESP for a minor (likely to a trust). Is the contribution taxable? If so, who is taxable &#8211; the contributing trust, or the minor?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Four Pillars</title>
		<link>http://www.moneysmartsblog.com/resp-a-comparison-to-non-registered-accounts/comment-page-1/#comment-10768</link>
		<dc:creator>Four Pillars</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Feb 2009 13:03:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moneysmartsblog.com/resp-a-comparison-to-non-registered-accounts/#comment-10768</guid>
		<description>PTR - still not sure what you are talking about.  Sorry.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>PTR &#8211; still not sure what you are talking about.  Sorry.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PTR</title>
		<link>http://www.moneysmartsblog.com/resp-a-comparison-to-non-registered-accounts/comment-page-1/#comment-10765</link>
		<dc:creator>PTR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Feb 2009 04:48:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moneysmartsblog.com/resp-a-comparison-to-non-registered-accounts/#comment-10765</guid>
		<description>Sorry, that should have read &quot;tax&quot; not interest. Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry, that should have read &#8220;tax&#8221; not interest. Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Four Pillars</title>
		<link>http://www.moneysmartsblog.com/resp-a-comparison-to-non-registered-accounts/comment-page-1/#comment-10707</link>
		<dc:creator>Four Pillars</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2009 00:40:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moneysmartsblog.com/resp-a-comparison-to-non-registered-accounts/#comment-10707</guid>
		<description>PTR - I don&#039;t understand your scenario.

What interest are you talking about?  Tax on the initial contribution?  Huh?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>PTR &#8211; I don&#8217;t understand your scenario.</p>
<p>What interest are you talking about?  Tax on the initial contribution?  Huh?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PTR</title>
		<link>http://www.moneysmartsblog.com/resp-a-comparison-to-non-registered-accounts/comment-page-1/#comment-10706</link>
		<dc:creator>PTR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 23:53:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moneysmartsblog.com/resp-a-comparison-to-non-registered-accounts/#comment-10706</guid>
		<description>Good discussion - I have a question - if you are contributing to an RESP from a Trust, who pays interest on the initial contribution? The contributing trust wouldn&#039;t as it is set up as a payable at year end which eliminates tax in the hands of the trust. If the beneficiary is either a minor, or a trust established for a minor (both cases under a RESP) I would assume that the minor, or the minor&#039;s trust would have the liability for the tax on the initial contribution - correct?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good discussion &#8211; I have a question &#8211; if you are contributing to an RESP from a Trust, who pays interest on the initial contribution? The contributing trust wouldn&#8217;t as it is set up as a payable at year end which eliminates tax in the hands of the trust. If the beneficiary is either a minor, or a trust established for a minor (both cases under a RESP) I would assume that the minor, or the minor&#8217;s trust would have the liability for the tax on the initial contribution &#8211; correct?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

