<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Four Pillars of Investing:  Ch 1, 2</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.moneysmartsblog.com/the-four-pillars-of-investing-ch-1/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.moneysmartsblog.com/the-four-pillars-of-investing-ch-1/</link>
	<description>Investing and Personal Finance</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 04:38:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: A twisty road &#171; centsprout</title>
		<link>http://www.moneysmartsblog.com/the-four-pillars-of-investing-ch-1/comment-page-1/#comment-1814</link>
		<dc:creator>A twisty road &#171; centsprout</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Oct 2007 20:56:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moneysmartsblog.com/the-four-pillars-of-investing-ch-1/#comment-1814</guid>
		<description>[...] bank is near the library and so I went and picked up The Four Pillars of Investing that seems to be so highly recommended. Maybe by the time I&#8217;m done reading it, I&#8217;ll have a better plan to get [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] bank is near the library and so I went and picked up The Four Pillars of Investing that seems to be so highly recommended. Maybe by the time I&#8217;m done reading it, I&#8217;ll have a better plan to get [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: <![CDATA[FourPillars]]></title>
		<link>http://www.moneysmartsblog.com/the-four-pillars-of-investing-ch-1/comment-page-1/#comment-1584</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[FourPillars]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Jul 2007 05:10:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moneysmartsblog.com/the-four-pillars-of-investing-ch-1/#comment-1584</guid>
		<description>Just ignore the second comment - I had multiple comments going in multiple browsers and clearly it didn&#039;t work.

Mike</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just ignore the second comment &#8211; I had multiple comments going in multiple browsers and clearly it didn&#8217;t work.</p>
<p>Mike</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: <![CDATA[FourPillars]]></title>
		<link>http://www.moneysmartsblog.com/the-four-pillars-of-investing-ch-1/comment-page-1/#comment-1583</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[FourPillars]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Jul 2007 04:16:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moneysmartsblog.com/the-four-pillars-of-investing-ch-1/#comment-1583</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the link!

Mike</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the link!</p>
<p>Mike</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: <![CDATA[FourPillars]]></title>
		<link>http://www.moneysmartsblog.com/the-four-pillars-of-investing-ch-1/comment-page-1/#comment-1582</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[FourPillars]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Jul 2007 03:52:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moneysmartsblog.com/the-four-pillars-of-investing-ch-1/#comment-1582</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the link!

Obviously I enjoyed the book quite a bit but one comment I&#039;d like to make is that he is pretty steadfast (absolute?) on the assertion that higher risk = higher reward.  I&#039;ll agree that statement makes sense in theory over the very long run but in reality it may not always be perfectly true.  He uses the example of small cap vs large cap (as u mentioned) but the data he uses stretches over quite a few decades as I recall.  Even if that trend continues in the future - the time period involved is so large that it might be irrelevant for most investors.

Mike</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the link!</p>
<p>Obviously I enjoyed the book quite a bit but one comment I&#8217;d like to make is that he is pretty steadfast (absolute?) on the assertion that higher risk = higher reward.  I&#8217;ll agree that statement makes sense in theory over the very long run but in reality it may not always be perfectly true.  He uses the example of small cap vs large cap (as u mentioned) but the data he uses stretches over quite a few decades as I recall.  Even if that trend continues in the future &#8211; the time period involved is so large that it might be irrelevant for most investors.</p>
<p>Mike</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: <![CDATA[FinancialJungle]]></title>
		<link>http://www.moneysmartsblog.com/the-four-pillars-of-investing-ch-1/comment-page-1/#comment-1580</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[FinancialJungle]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jul 2007 20:17:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moneysmartsblog.com/the-four-pillars-of-investing-ch-1/#comment-1580</guid>
		<description>Relative valuations of companies within the same sector (e.g. Walmart and Kmart) are usually pretty efficient, although not necessary so between sectors.  Just look at banks versus tech companies in 1999/2000.  This isn&#039;t a 20/20 hindsight, because virtually all value investors steered clear of the unsustainable high PEs of tech stocks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Relative valuations of companies within the same sector (e.g. Walmart and Kmart) are usually pretty efficient, although not necessary so between sectors.  Just look at banks versus tech companies in 1999/2000.  This isn&#8217;t a 20/20 hindsight, because virtually all value investors steered clear of the unsustainable high PEs of tech stocks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

